Prepared by Željko Tukovic, Philip Cardiff and Ivan Batistić
In this case, an internally pressurised bi-material thick-walled cylinder is analysed (Figure 1). The problem is considered plane stress, with a quarter of the domain modelled because of symmetry. The case is simulated as a steady state using one loading step. The outside surface is modelled as stress-free, and the left and bottom boundaries are symmetry planes. The inner bore surface has a prescribed constant pressure \(p_i=1\times 10^5\) Pa. The inner material (region 1 in Figure 1) has a Poisson's ratio of \(\nu_1=0.35\) and a Young's modulus of \(E_1 = 20\) GPa, while the outer material (region 2 in Figure 1) has a Poisson's ratio of \(\nu_2=0.3\) and a Young's modulus of \(E_2 = 200\) GPa; this results in an order of magnitude difference between the Young's modulii, i.e., \(E_2/E_1=10\). The number of cells is set to \(120\) circumferentially and \(50\) radially.
Figure 1 - Problem geometry [1]
Comparison between numerical and analytical solutions is performed in terms of circumferential and radial stresses in the radial direction through the cylinder, for which the analytical solutions are as follows [1]:
\[\sigma_r = \frac{r_1^2p_i-r_2^2p_{12}+(p_{12}-p_i)\left(\dfrac{r_1r_2}{r}\right)^2}{r_2^2-r _1^2} \qquad \text{for } r_1 \leq r < r_2,\] \[\sigma_r = \frac{r_2^2p_{12}-p_{12}\left(\dfrac{r_2r_3}{r}\right)^2}{r_3^2-r_2^2} \qquad \text{for } r_2 < r \leq r_3,\] \[\sigma_{\theta} = \frac{r_1^2p_i-r_2^2p_{12}-(p_{12}-p_i)\left(\dfrac{r_1r_2}{r}\right)^2}{r_2^2-r _1^2} \qquad \text{for } r_1 \leq r < r_2,\] \[\sigma_{\theta} = \frac{r_2^2p_{12}+p_{12}\left(\dfrac{r_2r_3}{r}\right)^2}{r_3^2-r_2^2} \qquad \text{for } r_2 < r \leq r_3,\]where the pressure at the interface, \(p_{12}\) is given as follows:
\[p_{12}=\dfrac{\dfrac{2r_1^2p_i}{E_1(r_2^2-r_1^2)}}{\dfrac{1}{E_2}\left(\dfrac{r_ 3^2+r_2^2}{r_3^2-r_2^2}+\nu_2 \right) + \dfrac{1}{E_1}\left(\dfrac{r_2^2+r_1^2}{r_2^2-r_1^2}-\nu_1 \right)}.\]Figures 2 and 3 show a comparison between the analytical and numerical solutions of radial \(\sigma_r\) and circumferential \(\sigma_{\theta}\) stress distributions. One can see that the numerical solution closely matches the analytical one.
Figure 2: Comparison of numerical (circles) and analytical (line) radial stress distributions
Figure 3: Comparison of numerical (circles) and analytical (line) circumferential stress distributions
The plots above are created automatically within the Allrun
script using sample
utility and gnuplot
. The transformStressToCylindrical
function object in system/controlDict
is used to transform the \(\sigma\) stress tensor from Cartesian coordinates to the cylindrical:
functions
{
transformStressToCylindrical
{
type transformStressToCylindrical;
origin (0 0 0);
axis (0 0 1);
}
}
The cylindrical stresses (sigma:Transformed
) are plotted along a \(\theta=45^{\circ}\) line using the sample
utility:
fields( sigma:Transformed );
sets
(
line
{
type face;
axis distance;
start (0.0 0.0 0.0005);
end (0.07 0.07 0.0005);
}
);
The tutorial case is located at solids4foam/tutorials/solids/multiMaterial/layeredPipe
. The case can be run using the included Allrun
script, i.e. > ./Allrun
. In this case, the Allrun
creates the mesh using blockMesh
(> blockMesh
) followed by calls to the setSet
and setsToZones
utilities to create cell zones for inner and outer cylinder materials. After that, the case is run with the solids4Foam
solver (> solids4Foam
). As the last step, the sample
utility is used to extract data. Optionally, if gnuplot
is installed, the radial and circumferential stress distributions are plotted in the sigmaR.png
and sigmaTheta.png
files.
For multi-material cases, solids4foam expects to find a cellZone for eachmaterial defined in constant/mechanicalProperties, where the cellZone name isassumed to be the same as the material name in constant/mechanicalProperties.